-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 30, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> > wrote: >> To clarify: cruft that should have been removed 3.0 is fine to >> remove for >> 3.0.1, for some definition of "should have been". > > Just to double check, can I take this as a green light to continue > with the cmp removal (http://bugs.python.org/issue1717) for 3.0.1? Yep, go ahead. Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSYRVrHEjvBPtnXfVAQK9SQQAiJct3mWt/+ZIOkI7DDRoBdz8yFvrmbLX 6AnbW+owvnnlzB9QX5PyDfTaTJa5pLJuoiWYRb7vCzxH1daW9KuFvF9qnaYXUhiO TLkyaO/R40aarB79NkE6J8wyRjYRyMoZgz10/GzxWkQgvTg38ESeKh3b6YRyph0N uo18odqAGEs= =QDP8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4