A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085693.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] Merging to the 3.0 maintenance branch"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Fri Jan 30 03:27:03 CET 2009
> There are potential problems with doing it that way [1]. The safer
> option is to do:
> 
> svn revert .
> svnmerge merge -M -F <py3k-rev>

I still don't see the potential problem. If you do svnmerge, svn commit,
all is fine, right? The problem *only* arises if you do svnmerge,
svn up, svn commit - and clearly, you shouldn't do that. If, on commit,
you get a conflict, you should revert all your changes, svn up, and
start all over with the merge.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4