RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 30 02:04:36 CET 2009 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085689.html

Raymond Hettinger <python <at> rcn.com> writes:
> 
> * If you're thinking that shelves have very few users and that
>   3.0.0 has had few adopters, doesn't that mitigate the effects
>   of making a better format available in 3.0.1?  Wouldn't this
>   be the time to do it?

There was already another proposal for an sqlite-based dbm module, you may
want to synchronize with it:
http://bugs.python.org/issue3783

As I see it, the problem with introducing it in 3.0.1 is that we would be
rushing in a new piece of code without much review or polish. Also, there are
only two release blockers left for 3.0.1, so we might just finish those and
release, then concentrate on 3.1.

Regards

Antoine.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085689.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1