RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jan 28 08:24:25 CET 2009 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085592.html

-On [20090128 00:57], Barry Warsaw (barry at python.org) wrote:
>I stand by my opinion about the right way to do this.  I also think  
>that a 3.1 release 6 months after 3.0 is perfectly fine and serves our  
>users just as well.

When API fixes were mentioned, does that mean changes in the API which
influence the C extension? If so, then I think a minor number update (3.1)
is more warranted than a revision number update (3.0.1).

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン
http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B
Earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust...

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085592.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1