Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jan 27, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > >> If something gets left in 3.0.1 and then ripped-out in 3.1, I think we're >> doing more harm than good. Very little code has been ported to 3.0 >> so far. One there is a base, all changes become more difficult. > >> In the interests of our users, I vote for sooner than later. > >> Also, 3.0 is a special case because it is IMO a broken release. >> AFAICT, it is not in any distro yet. Hopefully, no one will keep it >> around >> and it will vanish silently. > > I stand by my opinion about the right way to do this. I also think that > a 3.1 release 6 months after 3.0 is perfectly fine and serves our users > just as well. > +1 regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4