-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 27, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > If something gets left in 3.0.1 and then ripped-out in 3.1, I think > we're > doing more harm than good. Very little code has been ported to 3.0 > so far. One there is a base, all changes become more difficult. > > In the interests of our users, I vote for sooner than later. > > Also, 3.0 is a special case because it is IMO a broken release. > AFAICT, it is not in any distro yet. Hopefully, no one will keep it > around > and it will vanish silently. I stand by my opinion about the right way to do this. I also think that a 3.1 release 6 months after 3.0 is perfectly fine and serves our users just as well. Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBSX+fNnEjvBPtnXfVAQJO1QQAmRVH0tslNfRfpQsC+2jlJu5uljOVvuvN uE3/HFktxLUr6NPdOk+Ir1r2p4mQ5iXFlZbJvOSNckM3UYSFkeKmS/T0nVJzqx89 +23sv7UC2Qf8zJRJBEhzuePT1iAE8OybRH1Vxql9ka8FVzCrZHt2JhnRZUmHNblT Y2d92iL7eqE= =Qzdr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4