If something gets left in 3.0.1 and then ripped-out in 3.1, I think we're doing more harm than good. Very little code has been ported to 3.0 so far. One there is a base, all changes become more difficult. In the interests of our users, I vote for sooner than later. Also, 3.0 is a special case because it is IMO a broken release. AFAICT, it is not in any distro yet. Hopefully, no one will keep it around and it will vanish silently. Raymond ----- Original Message ----- I have no problem with removing things that were advertised and/or documented to be removed in 3.0 but accidentally were not. That seems like a reasonable policy to me. However, if we did not tell people that something was going to be removed, then I don't think we can really remove it in 3.0. Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4