[Benjamin Peterson] > It seems like we are arguing over the version number of basically the > same thing. I would like to see 3.0.1 released in early February for > nearly the reasons you name. However, it seems to me that there are > two kinds of issues: those like __cmp__ removal and some silly IO bugs > that have been fixed for a while and our waiting to be released. > There's also projects like io in c which are important, but would not > make the schedule you and I want for 3.0.1/3.1. What is involved in finishing io-in-c? ISTM, that is critical and that its absence is a serious barrier to adoption in a production environment. How far away is it? Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4