A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085539.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1 [Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Tue Jan 27 21:40:20 CET 2009
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:28 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>> At the moment, there are 4 release blockers for 3.0.1. I'd like to see
>> 3.0.1 released soon (within the next month.)
>
> I agree. In December, there was a huge sense of urgency that we
> absolutely must have a 3.0.1 last year - and now people talk about
> giving up 3.0 entirely.
>
> Releasing 3.1 6 months after 3.0 sounds reasonable; I don't think
> it should be released earlier (else 3.0 looks fairly ridiculous).

It sounds like my approval of Raymond's removal of certain (admittedly
obsolete) operators from the 3.0 branch was premature. Barry at least
thinks those should be rolled back. Others?

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4