On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>wrote: > > At the moment, there are 4 release blockers for 3.0.1. I'd like to see > 3.0.1 released soon (within the next month.) It would fix the hugest > mistakes in the initial release most of which have been done committed > since December. I'm sure it would be attractive enough with the nasty > bugs fixed in it! Let's not completely open the flood gates. > > Releasing 3.1 in March or April also sounds good. I will be at least > at the first day of sprints. > As an interested observer, but not yet user of the 3.x series, I was wondering about progress on restoring io performance and what release those improvements were slated for. This is the major blocker for me to begin porting my non-numpy/scipy dependent code. Much of my current work is in bioinformatics, often dealing with multi-gigabyte datasets, so file io fast is critical. Otherwise, I'll have to live with 2.x for the indefinite future. Thanks, ~Kevin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090127/02a11a1c/attachment.htm>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4