-On [20090115 01:11], Guido van Rossum (guido at python.org) wrote: >I'm with Martin. In these days of distributed version control systems, >I would think that the effort for the Haiku folks to maintain a branch >of Python in their own version control would be minimal. It is likely >that for each new Python version that comes out, initially it is >broken on Haiku, and then they have to go in and fix it. Last time I looked at Haiku and dabbled with it there were some people actively working on POSIX compliance. My only guess right now is that this work is largely complete. In effect that would mean that Python would work out of the box, more or less. So the cost of adding and maintaining it in the main repository should not be a big overhaul or anything. Just as a FYI. :) -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(-at-)in-nomine.org> / asmodai イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェルヴェン http://www.in-nomine.org/ | http://www.rangaku.org/ | GPG: 2EAC625B Earth to earth, ashes to ashes, dust to dust...
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4