Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085009.html below:

[Python-Dev] __long__ method still exists in Python 3.x

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] How should I handle unsupported features?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] __long__ method still exists in Python 3.x
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I noticed that the builtin numeric types (int, float, complex) all still
have a __long__ method in 3.x.  Shouldn't this have disappeared as
part of the int/long unification?  Is there any reason not to remove this
(by setting the nb_long entry to 0 in all three cases)?

Mark

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] How should I handle unsupported features?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] __long__ method still exists in Python 3.x
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4