RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jan 8 20:33:57 CET 2009 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/084935.html

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> So it turns out that if you try to do a relative import where a parent
> is not loaded, it raises a SystemError. This has been in there since
> Guido added package support back in the day. But this seems more like
> an ImportError than a SystemError to me. My guess is that the original
> purpose was to signify someone specified some relative import name
> without the proper stuff to make the name resolve to what it should
> be. But that to me is still an ImportError as the name came out wrong,
> not that the system did something incorrectly.
>
> So I would like to propose to remove the SystemError and make it an
> ImportError. Anyone object?

Hm. The SystemError is because this is a logical impossibility -- how
could you be doing an import (relative or otherwise) from P.M when P
is not loaded? It could only happen if somebody has been removing
stuff selectively from sys.modules. Why don't you want this to be a
SystemError?

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/084935.html below:

[Python-Dev] Is raising SystemError during relative import the best solution?