A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/086119.html below:

[Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*

[Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.* [Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Sat Feb 14 19:56:04 CET 2009
Don't rely on me getting importlib bootstrapped in by 3.1. It would be great
if I pull it off, but I am afraid that is being optimistic. The library
itself should definitely be done, though.

On Feb 13, 2009 7:56 PM, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

Benjamin Peterson <benjamin <at> python.org> writes: > > Are we going to
keep developing the 3.0 ma...
Focusing on 3.1 should be ok.
So what are the expected efforts for 3.1?
- io-in-C
- import-in-Python
- ... anything else?

Regards

Antoine.

_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev at python.org http...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090214/69e0b436/attachment.htm>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4