On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
[..]
>> Not really. That's mostly because I reused the existing implementation
>> and I found them quite readable in that case. But a string.Formatter
>> could work well here too I guess.
>
> Just figured that with formatters the way of the future that
> "{base}/include" would work just as well and be "future-proof".
> -Brett
Sure, I'll change it that way, thanks for the tip
Tarek
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4