>> DrKJam <drkjam <at> gmail.com> writes: >>> netaddr employs a simple variant of the GoF Strategy design pattern (with >> added Python sensibility). >> >> It would be nice if you could avoid employing this kind of acronyms >> without explaining them. Not everybody drinks the design pattern >> kool-aid. > > A pity, since the entire point of Design Patterns is to give us a > vocabulary of terms to use that enable these concepts to be communicated > *without* continually re-defining them. To that extent, then, they fail > their purpose. I think it's too early to tell. It may be that they have not yet achieved their purpose - just let's wait fifty more years (and I'm only half-joking). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4