On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Benjamin Peterson<benjamin at python.org> wrote: > 2009/8/14 Frank Wierzbicki <fwierzbicki at gmail.com>: >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Benjamin Peterson<benjamin at python.org> wrote: >> >>>> I have a local patch that changes the CPython col_offset to match >>>> Jython's, but before I submit a patch I thought I'd ask here if there >>>> is support for this sort of change and if I should continue to find >>>> col_offset and lineno results that look fishy to me, or should I just >>>> change Jython's results to match (one way or another, things will be >>>> much easier for me to test if they match). >>> >>> Yes, please submit it. >> Great, the patch is here: http://bugs.python.org/issue6704 > > I'll take a look. > >> >> BTW - I would have added a test to test_ast.py, but above the test >> data it notes: #### EVERYTHING BELOW IS GENERATED ##### and I couldn't >> find the tool used for the generation. Does anyone know where that >> is? > > It's at the bottom of the test file. :) You can add a handwritten test > above that, though. Heh -- how did I miss that :) ? -- I'll resubmit the patch with tests. -Frank
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4