Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen <at> xemacs.org> writes: > > Well, the problem is that both parts are false. If you didn't start > with a valid string in a known encoding, you shouldn't treat it as > characters because it's not. Hand it to a careful API, and you'll get > an Exception raised in your face. Which "careful API" are you talking about? > OTOH, at least some of those who feel lucky and use it > naively are going to turn out to be wrong. Why will they turn out to be wrong?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4