Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2009/4/18 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>: >> I see a few options: >> 1. Abandon the "python" name for the 3.x series and commit to calling it >> "python3" now and forever (i.e. actually make the decision that Mitchell >> refers to). > > I believe this was decided on sometime (the sprints?). If that decision has already been made, then sure, changing the shebang lines to use the new name is the right thing to do. It certainly wouldn't be the first time something was discussed at Pycon or the sprints and those involved forgot to mention the outcome on the list :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4