RetroSearch Browse

Tue Apr 7 17:41:06 CEST 2009 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/088427.html

Mark Dickinson wrote:
> [snip...]
>   
> Discussion points
> =================
>
> (1) Any objections to including this into py3k?  If there's
> controversy, then I guess we'll need a PEP.
>   

Big +1
> (2) Should other Python implementations (Jython,
> IronPython, etc.) be expected to use short float repr, or should
> it just be considered an implementation detail of CPython?
> I propose the latter, except that all implementations should
> be required to satisfy eval(repr(x)) == x for finite floats x.
>   
Short float repr should be an implementation detail, so long as 
eval(repr(x)) == x still holds.

Michael Foord

-- 
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-April/088427.html below:

[Python-Dev] Shorter float repr in Python 3.1?