2009/4/4 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > Hello, > > Currently, BufferedReader.peek() ignores its argument and can return more or > less than the number of bytes requested by the user. This is how it was > implemented in the Python version, and we've reflected this in the C version. > > It seems a bit strange and unhelpful though. Should we change the implementation > so that the argument to peek() becomes the upper bound to the number of bytes > returned? +1 That sounds more useful. > > Thanks for your advice, -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4