At 07:50 AM 10/25/2008 -0400, A.M. Kuchling wrote: >On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 04:33:23PM +1300, Greg Ewing wrote: > > Maybe not, but at least you can follow what it's doing > > just by knowing C. Introducing vmgen would introduce another > > layer for the reader to learn about. > >A stray thought: does using a generator for the VM make life easier >for the Stackless Python developers in any way? Does it make it >possible for stock CPython to become stackless? Dunno about that, but I do know that having stack effect info for the bytecode could help with things like bytecode verification (without having to define a bunch of magic constants that duplicate information from the innards of ceval.c).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4