> ISTM, that 3.0 and 2.6 backports have consumed substantial developer > attention over the last few months. Sure - but who is going to sit down and study the commit logs, to do backporting? Unless someone specifically volunteers to do that (with a specific timeline when he will start, and when he will complete), I see little chance that that any additional backporting will happen. I will send an announcement asking people to propose missing backports. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4