On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Brett Cannon has suggested [1] that the logging package should provide an > implementation of warnings.showwarning which redirects to logging. Here are my > first thoughts about how this might work: > > A new function, showwarning( message, category, filename, lineno[, file]) will > be added to the logging package. To redirect all warnings to the logging system, > it will only be necessary to do the following: > > warnings.showwarning = logging.showwarning <snip> > > Does this sound like a reasonable approach? Can someone please suggest any > improvements, or let me know if I've missed anything? I do have one suggestion for improvement: instead of requiring the person to do this monkey patching, add a new 'log' action to the warnings filter as described by PEP 230 [1] (see: 'The Warnings Filter' section). This way, changing the behavior of how warnings are displayed (or not) is kept consistent and documented. [1] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0230/ -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systems http://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 Skype zopedc
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4