Stephen J. Turnbull schrieb: > Tres Seaver writes: > > > svn doesn't have any true tags, AFAIK: everything is a branch. > > Yow! I couldn't have imagined that would be true. And didn't.... It's not exactly true either. svn doesn't have either tags or branches, it has only a single (directory) tree per repository, of which individual subdirectories can be checked out individually. This is the root of the usual first step in creating a SVN repo: make "branches", "trunk" and "tags" subdirs. In this context it is not surprising that there is no separate branch or tag concept. I think the reason is that CVS *had* branches and tags as separate concepts and it must have been relatively painful to use them. cheers, Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4