Martin added a new "stage" field in the tracker so that issues can now be more clearly identified in terms of what is needed to move them forward. For now it is probably best to continue to use both keywords and stage values (i.e. the "patch" keyword is implied when the stage of an issue goes beyond "needs patch" and the need for a "patch review" is covered by the "commit review" stage). Once the use of the stage gets far enough along we can discussed ditching the keywords. Anyway, cheers to our first step in improving our workflow! -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4