Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Ralf Schmitt <schmir at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>>> So you're saying py.test needs to be fixed? Fine with me, but then I
>>> don't understand why you bothered bringing it up here instead of
>>> fixing it (or reporting to the py.test maintainers, I don't know if
>>> you're one or not).
>>>
>> no, I'm not. Just wanted to point out, that this ticket/patch does not
>> solve the django issue.
>> (this is what I first thought it would do).
>
> I'm still missing details.
>
I'm going to spend some time looking into this this weekend (issue
assigned appropriately. Getting it working again shouldn't be too bad
(just revert the relevants bits to their 2.5 equivalents) - the tricky
part is going to be keeping the warning of the associated change to the
semantics in 3.0.
(I'll also take a look at 3.0 to make sure the relevant test case from
the tracker issue works properly there)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4