On Jun 27, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > I think code that uses this is probably already quite broken in some > fundamental way and putting the fix in 2.5 isn't much of a risk. I suspect the risk has more to do with breaking something else in Python than in breaking 3rd-party code in this case. I think it should be fixed for 2.5 as well, myself. -Fred -- Fred Drake <fdrake at acm.org>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4