On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Leif Walsh <adlaiff6 at gmail.com> wrote: > I haven't been following this thread very closely, so I'm not sure > what the status is, but I'd just like to point out that yesterday I > used the fact that a[None] = b works, when I used the @memoize > decorator from the wiki. This seems to provide an argument that, for > symmetry's sake, we might want to keep a.None = b as well. That makes about as much sense as wanting to support a.42 = b since a[42] = b works. :-) -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4