Jesse Noller wrote:
> However, the flip side of this is that no one really "likes" the
> threading API as-is, so putting the module into the standard library
> with the matching API simply adds another "broken" API.
Provided threading gets a PEP 8 style API in 2.6 (which it looks like it
is going to), then I don't see a problem with multiprocessing only
providing the new API.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4