Guido van Rossum wrote: > last time '@' was considered as a new operator, that character had no > uses in the language at all. Now it is the decorator marker. The only alternatives left would seem to be ?, ! or $, none of which look particularly multiplicationish. > But would it be totally outlandish to propose A**B for matrix > multiplication? I can't think of what "matrix exponentiation" would > mean... But ** has the same problem -- it already represents an elementwise operation on numpy arrays. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4