A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-July/081490.html below:

[Python-Dev] Any PEP about 2.6 -> 3000 code transition?

[Python-Dev] Any PEP about 2.6 -> 3000 code transition? [Python-Dev] Any PEP about 2.6 -> 3000 code transition?Lennart Regebro regebro at gmail.com
Mon Jul 21 23:37:04 CEST 2008
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 20:16, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> But waiting until all the betas have gone out totally defeats the
> purpose of the betas!

I agree. Writing an actual *guide* can wait, but documenting the
differences with code examples is a work that can start now, and I
agree that it would be great if this would start now.

But writing a guide might not be a good idea until we know what the
changes are, and if the API is changing quickly now we don't. :-)

-- 
Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.
http://www.colliberty.com/
+33 661 58 14 64
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4