RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jul 16 00:36:56 CEST 2008 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-July/081181.html

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:

> Terry Reedy writes:
> 
>  > For the community as a whole, all stdlib modules are suggestions
>  > and examples, not commands.
> 
> Well, even if "standard" is too strong a word, the DeprecationWarnings
> and eventual removal of the methods surely constitute an imposition.

I understood Terry's statement as meaning that there is no commandment
to use the standard library 'unittest' module at all. If a user
doesn't like the behaviour of a module (such as 'unittest') in the
standard library, they can accept the burden of implementing one that
behaves the way they like.

-- 
 \       “I never forget a face, but in your case I'll be glad to make |
  `\                                      an exception.” —Groucho Marx |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-July/081181.html below:

Consolidating names and classes in the `unittest` module (updated 2008-07-15)