> Why was this test disabled, rather than fixed? That seems a rather > poor solution to the problem of it taking longer than desired to run. I disabled it because I didn't know how to fix it, and created bug reports 2968 and 2969 in return. It is policy that tests that break get disabled, rather than keeping them broken. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4