RetroSearch Browse

Mon Dec 8 22:12:25 CET 2008 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-December/084132.html

Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> Actually, I think your suggested scheme for the one-dimensional case
> shows the way forward: ownership of the shape and strides memory belongs
> to the object issuing the Py_buffer struct, and that object needs to
> deal with it when the buffer is released. Defining a larger memory chunk
> with the Py_buffer as the first item and the shape and stride info
> tacked onto the end and returning that from PyObject_GetBuffer() means
> that the shape/stride info will be released automatically when the view
> is released via PyBuffer_Release().

Ok, so another question: given that this will change the Py_buffer layout a bit,
can it go into 3.0.1 and 2.6.2?

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-December/084132.html below:

[Python-Dev] Allocation of shape and strides fields in Py_buffer