> ISTM, 3.0 is in pretty good shape. There is nothing intrinsically wrong > with it. I think it has many bugs, some known before the release, but many more yet to show up. I agree that the design is good; the implementation will certainly improve (I deliberately didn't say "could have been better", because it could not have been better, given the time available to the contributors). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4