Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-November/075355.html below:

[Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Christian Heimes wrote:
> Without support from the descriptor it's not possible to distinguish a
> function from an unbound method any more. I like to add im_class to the
> function object. I don't see negative side effects, do you?

OK, forget that. Pretend I've never said it. I shouldn't submit ideas
until coffee shows its effect.

Christian

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4