At 11:11 AM 11/2/2007 +1300, Greg Ewing wrote: >Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > Let's stick with "propset" which has precedent as an svn action and > > serves as a short, simple mnemonic to the functionality. > >But if we're going to have "propset", it raises the question >of why there isn't a "propget". Which can be eliminated by having property.setter, especially in the form: @property def foo(self): ... @foo.setter def foo(self, value): ... @foo.deleter def foo(self): ... This even preserves Guido's "read-only + read-write" use case, and saves us a builtin.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4