Titus Brown wrote: > * second, I'd like to add a 'require_success' bool keyword, that is > by default False (and does nothing in that case). However, when > True, the functions would emulate check_call, i.e. they would raise > CalledProcessError when the returncode was not zero. By the no-constant-parameters principle, I think it would be better to have another set of functions for this. They should be named without 'status' in the names, since if the function returns at all, the status is always going to be zero. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4