A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-March/072244.html below:

[Python-Dev] Breaking calls to object.__init__/__new__

[Python-Dev] Breaking calls to object.__init__/__new__ [Python-Dev] Breaking calls to object.__init__/__new__Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Mar 22 04:21:50 CET 2007
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> See python.org/sf/1683368. I'd like to invite opinions on whether it's
> worth breaking an unknown amount of user code in 2.6 for the sake of
> stricter argument checking for object.__init__

Personally I have never written code that relies on
being able to pass arbitrary args to object.__init__
and don't ever intend to, so this wouldn't bother
me.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | Carpe post meridiem!          	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | (I'm not a morning person.)          |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4