A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-March/072235.html below:

[Python-Dev] Extended Buffer Interface/Protocol

[Python-Dev] Extended Buffer Interface/Protocol [Python-Dev] Extended Buffer Interface/ProtocolNeil Hodgson nyamatongwe at gmail.com
Thu Mar 22 03:13:57 CET 2007
Greg Ewing:

> So an array-of-pointers interface wouldn't be a direct
> substitute for the existing multi-segment buffer
> interface.

   Providing an array of (pointer,length) wouldn't be too much extra
work for a split vector implementation.

Guido van Rossum:

> But there's always a call to remove the gap (or move it to the end).

   Yes, although its something you try to avoid.

   I'm not saying that this is an important use-case since no one
seems to have produced a split vector implementation that provides the
buffer protocol. Numeric-style array handling is much more common so
deserves priority.

   Neil
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4