At 10:39 PM 3/15/2007 +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >That said, if it makes people more comfortable with having a warning >added, I won't object. It's just that I don't want to be the one to >take the blame for issuing the warning, because deep in my heart I >feel that warnings are a bad thing, unless they are right most of the >time (which they won't be in this case). Some other options: 1. Deprecate splitext() and remove it in 3.0 2. Add an optional flag argument to enable the new behavior 3. Create a new function with the new behavior (as you proposed the last time there was a patch submitted for this)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4