glyph at divmod.com schrieb: > However, the decision was a bad one regardless of the existing policy, > and sets a bad precedent while we are discussing this policy. I could > be wrong, but I think it would be reasonable to assume that if Martin > strongly supports such a change, Martin would oppose a policy which > would strictly forbid such changes, and it is just such a policy that > Python needs. I still can't guess what policy you have in mind, so I can't object to it :-) I may accept a policy that rejects this change, but allows another change to fix the problem. I would oppose a policy that causes this bug to be unfixable forever. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4