On 08:21 pm, martin at v.loewis.de wrote: >Mike Krell schrieb: >>FWIW, I agree completely with PJE's and glyph's remarks with respect >>to expectations of stability, especially in a minor release. > >Not sure what you mean by "minor release". The change isn't proposed >for the next bug fix release (2.5.1), but for the next major release >(2.6). See PEP 6. Common parlance for the parts of a version number is: major.minor.micro See: http://twistedmatrix.com/documents/current/api/twisted.python.versions.Version.html#__init__ Changing this terminology about Python releases to be more consistent with other projects would be a a subtle, but good shift towards a generally better attitude of the expectations of "minor" releases. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20070315/a88224d5/attachment.htm
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4