On 3/8/07, Alexey Borzenkov <snaury at gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/7/07, Josiah Carlson <jcarlson at uci.edu> wrote: > > "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: > > > Now it's becoming difficult: several people in favor, some opposed... > > What about changing the semantics of splitext and creating a new > > function (available on all platforms) that does what the Windows version > > currently does? > I don't understand only one thing, why do people need new functions? > You can anticipate the change today, and write functions that do > exactly what you need no matter which way (current or proposed) python > implements: [...snip...] On second thought I completely forgot about path parts. > Best regards, > Alexey.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4