At 07:24 PM 3/6/2007 +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >given a list of file names, classify them for display (the > way the Windows explorer works, and similar file managers). > They use MIME databases and the like, and if they are unix-ish, > they probably reject the current splitext implementation already > as incorrect, and have work-arounds. I know I've written code like this that *depends* on the current behavior. It's *useful* to classify e.g. .svn directories or .*rc files by their "extension", so I'm honestly baffled by the idea of wanting to treat such files as *not* having an extension (as opposed to a possibly-unrecognized one).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4