[I don't know why I didn't receive this mail, presumably spam filter at gmx.net sucks as always] Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 08:23 PM 7/8/2007 +0300, Paul Pogonyshev wrote: > >I would like to propose an optimization (I think so, anyway) for the > >way attributes are looked up. [...] > > [...] > > Again, though, this has already been proposed, and I believe there's > a patch awaiting review for inclusion in 2.6 (and presumably 3.0). OK, good to know. Of course it is better if done by someone familiar with Python internals :) After proposing this I decided it wasn't worthwile, since it would require cache revalidation after any assignment to a new class attribute. But supposedly I just have incorrect picture of what is often in Python :) Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4