A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-July/073816.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni

[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struniGuido van Rossum guido at python.org
Wed Jul 11 08:48:49 CEST 2007
Please use self.assertEqual() instead of self.failUnlessEqual() -- the
assertEqual() form is much more common. Otherwise, good idea!

On 7/11/07, Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> wrote:
> Steven Bethard wrote:
> > I'd probably go with something a little more restrictive, maybe:
> >
> >     r'self.assert_\(\S+ == \S+\)'
> >
> > Something like that ought to have fewer false positives.
>
> Woops! You are right. Even your pattern has caused some false positives
> but I've reread the patch and removed the offending lines. I'm going to
> upload another patch as soon as I have verified mine again.
>
> Christian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-3000 mailing list
> Python-3000 at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org
>


-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4