RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jul 11 01:17:26 CEST 2007 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-July/073815.html

Steven Bethard wrote:
> I'd probably go with something a little more restrictive, maybe:
> 
>     r'self.assert_\(\S+ == \S+\)'
> 
> Something like that ought to have fewer false positives.

Woops! You are right. Even your pattern has caused some false positives
but I've reread the patch and removed the offending lines. I'm going to
upload another patch as soon as I have verified mine again.

Christian

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-July/073815.html below:

[Python-Dev] Need help fixing failing Py3k Unittests in py3k-struni