On 1/24/07, Ulisses Furquim <ulissesf at gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/24/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: > > I agree it's a bug, and I agree with your proposed analysis. Please > > try to come up with a patch (e.g. by putting a while(is_tripped) loop > > around the for loop). Also make sure you include test case. > > Ok. I was discussing this problem with a colleague of mine and he had > a nice idea on how to fix this. We couldn't think of anything wrong > with the solution, so I'm testing it right now and gonna write a test > case afterwards. Here is the link for the bug with both the test program and first attempt to solve it. http://www.python.org/sf/1643738 Regards, -- Ulisses
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4